Reminder: Article Grade Reviews

[Joe]

Just a reminder that if you feel your article was graded unfairly, we have a process in place for regrades in the original guideline post and I think I've mentioned it on the boards in the past (here: viewtopic.php?t=2909). This post also includes the details of the 4 parameters on how all articles are graded, and then the new article boni post (here: viewtopic.php?t=3873) has the details of how the boni work as background.

But in case those posts have been buried or people didn't read all the way through, I'm making a formal dedicated post about the review process so that it's clear for everyone.

The Grade Review Process:

If you feel you have been graded unfairly based on the parameters in either of the above posts, you can reach out to the graders (me, Quady and Nav) via text and ask for clarification / explain why you think we may have missed something about how complex or difficult it was to create your article, for example (we miss things sometimes, we're happy to chat!). We will then regrade your article based on the new information, according to our 4 parameters - we can't guarantee that the new grade will be higher (technically it could be lower), but I think anyone who has asked for a regrade in the past would say that we've been pretty reasonable and approachable.

Please don't just make a stink on the boards, it isn't productive and it's a pain in the butt for us to deal with; I promise we are not trying to actively bone anyone and we are more than happy to hear you out if you shoot us a message directly.

[quady]

I would also add that we all value the content being produced by the league, and if anything, would like to encourage more of it!